RSS
 

Archive for January, 2006

Word Of Mouth – Fuzz Or Buzz?

24 Jan 2006

From [AdLand] :

A NYTimes article titled Advertising Is Obsolete. Everyone Says So. reports on the WOMMA conference held at the end of last week titled “Word of Mouth Vs. Advertising”. And as usual, WOMMA is telling people “Don’t advertise.” [...]

Seems they don’t even know what they are talking about themselves, since their experts are contradicting their “vs.” concept. [...]

What is interesting is that all of this puffery about disclosure seems to be a nice way to distract from the fact that WOMMA endorses the use of kids for WOM. Even at 13, they may be called teens but they are also still kids.

Read the full post on Adland.

Related Issues :

Is buzz illegal?
How young is too young to be a marketer?
Don’t make WOM become SPAM!
WOMMA ethics draft not well received
NIMF attacks WOMMA for “buzzploiting” children and teens
The Hidden (in Plain Sight) Persuaders debate
Justin Kirby sheds light on difference between viral and deception.
Word of mouth marketing – do we need regulation?
Bzzagent doing everything wrong – comment spam on the rise

 

Adverlicio.us

24 Jan 2006

Seems someone thought it would be cool to be able to upload, tag and categorize ads. How very 2.0 !

Adverlicio.us

adverlicio.us is to ads as del.icio.us is to web pages.

Check out adverlicio.us – via [Besting Adwords]

 

Commodore 64 Revival

24 Jan 2006

I have this very old Commodore 64 at home. I remember playing it as if it was yesterday. Boy, where has the time gone ? Didn’t you just love it you knew exactly to which location you had to fast forward the cassette for a certain game? Didn’t you just love the arcade games? Wonderboy? Blue Max? Pole Position? Donkey Kong? Well… that time has come around again with the c64s.com fan site ! I actually wasted a few hours on this site and to be honest, I think I will visit it again, and again, and again. OMG Pleasure Overload :) The music, the colors… I feel so 12 years old again :) Welcome to Retro-Gaming-Galore !

c64-1

c64-2

Check out 100 C64 Games in Java and revive ! Awesome !

 
No Comments

Posted in Games

 

Protecting Your Search Privacy

23 Jan 2006

SearchEngineWatch helps you cover your (local) search history with Harry Potter’s magic cloak. Too bad you actually can’t remove remotely stored information, but here’s five steps that help you deleting the local dirt pile and give you some insight in what’s happening with your information on the remote side:

1. Search Privacy On Your Own Computer
2. Search Privacy & Your ISP
3. Search Privacy & Your Search Engine
4. Search Privacy & Your Personalized Results
5. Search Privacy & Sites You Visit / Tracking Services

Interesting conclusion :

[...]most people probably think the conversations they have with search engines as being private. But to date, we don’t have any protected searcher-search engine relationship as we do with attorney-client privilege or between clergy and worshipper. Perhaps that needs to be enshrined in some way. But then again, others may feel that going out on to the public web and using publicly accessible search engines entitles no one to an expectation of privacy, or perhaps a more limited one.

Tune in to this article for more background information, follow the links at the bottom of the page.

 

Cory Doctorow in Antwerp

23 Jan 2006

Tomorrow I’ll go to a lecture by Cory Doctorow in Antwerp. Cory is a full-time blogger and is mostly known for his boingboing adventures, but he’s also the European representative of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an international organisation that stands up for the rights of the internauts, and he’s coming to tell us about how digital technology could limit the fragile rights of the viewer/consumer and about how the entertainment industry is trying to make its audience dependent of it (by means of something called ‘the broadcast flag’).

I hope I’ll be able to catch a moment to talk to mister Doctorow about some things, I’ll report about it tomorrow night when I get back home.

Cory Doctorow
Image nicked from Kottke’s Archive

‘Get your torch and pitchfork, for this genuinely sucks –
and you shouldn’t take it lying down!’

I’ll bring a pitchfork. See you there ! – Starting time : 7.30 PM at the MUHKA

 
 

Google Users Face Search Search

23 Jan 2006

In the light of the recent events about the case ‘Google vs. the Bushministration’, the TimesOnline came up with a pretty funny cartoon.

Google Search

Google users will face US government monitoring if the American authorities win a court case aimed at getting the website to hand over copies of every search conducted.

Read the article on the TimesOnline. – Thanks to my lovely girlfriend for digging this up !

 
 

Video Search And Making Money

22 Jan 2006

Search Engine Watch has released a special report from the Search Engine Strategies conference, December 5-8, 2005, Chicago, IL., written by guest writer Greg Jarboe. A very interesting look on the state of Video Search today.

Moderated by Chris Sherman, this session featured three executives from video search engines: Suranga Chandratillake, the co-founder and CTO of blinkx, John Thrall, head of Multi-Media Search Engineering at Yahoo! Search, and Karen Howe, vice president of AOL Search and General Manager of Singingfish. The session also featured one expert in video search from a full-service interactive agency: Jon Leicht, Senior Project Manager at SiteLab International.

Keypoint made by Jon Leicht :

[...] the key is producing meta information. He added that meta information can include keywords, but should be more descriptive for video search. File naming is critical and the page content where a file can be found appears to have an effect on media search. He also recommended producing a transcript of audio for use in Google.

Very interesting tips, especially the one where he advised to produce a transcript of audio.

Jon closed with some observations about the future for video search engines, saying “Content drives demand.” And, he said only thing preventing video owners and creators from submitting even more content to video search engines was finding a way to monetize video search results.

About this monetizing video search results… I know what Jon was pointing out is from the engine’s point of view, but here’s my two cents on the monetizing from content from a consumer’s point of view : I’ve been contacted recently on YouTube by someone who tried to lure me to motion.tv with the tease of making money from the clips I could upload there. Since I’m kind of a power user on YouTube, I have a rather large archive. Here starts a new moral discussion. The clips I upload to YouTube aren’t mine at all but are regarded as being ‘common property’ -internet videos and viral clips in general- so what gives me the right to make money from them? Violating copyright silently is one thing, because most of the time the owner can’t be tracked that fast, but making money from content you a) do not own and b) did not create… that just doesn’t sound very fair at all.

From Motion.tv’s about:

Motion.tv pays its members a percentage of monthly ad dollars generated. Payment is based on the popularity of your videos (how many times your videos are watched by others). The better the video, the higher the ranking – the higher the ranking the more people watch your video, the more people watch your video, the more money you make. It’s that simple.

So in fact, if I were to be a popular forum with thousands of users, like there are dozens, and if I were to upload clips to motion.tv instead of uploading them to ‘putfile.com’ or ‘yourfilehost.com’ or another third party media host, and if I then send all my users to the link I would provide, I could generate a lot of money on the back of the people who made the videos in the first place. Hmmm. Tempting. How ‘allowed’ can this be? It seems very easy to hide behind a disclaimer, but I think this is a grey zone that very urgently needs some regulations.

 

A Blogger’s Code

22 Jan 2006

Philipp pointed out 15 rules based on a press code, which should serve as a guideline throughout blogging. This blogger’s code is by no means obligatory, but it sure points out some serious issues. I know some people think bloggers and journalists shouldn’t be treated as being equal, but I think that sort of depends on what kind of news you are bringing and how serious you take yourself as a blogger. This list was reprinted with kind permission of Philipp Lenssen and fits in the frame Jason and I have been creating with our Blogiarism Interviews, a series in which we’ve interviewed 10 prominent bloggers about the code they follow when they’re linking to someone and about their vision on giving credit where it’s due.

  1. Respect for the truth, observance of human rights and accurate informing of blog visitors are the overriding principles of bloggers.
  2. The posting of specific news and information in text and photos must be carefully checked for accuracy in the light of existing circumstances. Its sense must not be distorted or falsified by editing, headlines or picture captions. Documents must be accurately reproduced. Unconfirmed reports, rumours or assumptions must be quoted as such. It must be clear, or made so, that symbolic photos are such.
  3. Posted news or assertions, particularly those related to persons, which turn out to be incorrect must be rectified promptly in an appropriate manner by the blog concerned.
  4. Dishonest methods must not be used to acquire person-related news, information or photos.
  5. Agreed confidentiality is to be observed as a fundamental principle.
  6. All those blogging shall preserve the standing and credibility of the blogspace at large, observe professional secrecy, use the right to refuse to give evidence, and not disclose the identity of informants without their express consent.
  7. The responsibility of bloggers towards the public requires that editorial blogging is not influenced by the private or business interests of third parties or by the personal commercial interests of bloggers. Bloggers must reject any attempts of this nature and make a clear distinction between editorial and commercial blog posts.
  8. Bloggers shall respect people’s private lives. If, however, the private behaviour of a person touches upon public interests, then it may be reported upon. Care must be taken to ensure that the personal rights of non-involved persons are not violated. Bloggers shall respect people’s right to self-determination on information about them and guarantee blogging data protection.
  9. It is contrary to blogging decorum to publish unfounded claims and accusations, particularly those that harm personal honor.
  10. Posting words and photos which could seriously offend the moral or religious feelings of a group of persons, in form or content, are irreconcilable with the responsibility of bloggers.
  11. Bloggers will refrain from inappropriately sensational portrayal of violence and brutality. The protection of young visitors is to be considered in blogging.
  12. No one may be discriminated against due to a handicap or their membership of a racial, ethnic, religious, social or national group.
  13. Blog posts on investigations, criminal court proceedings and other formal procedures must be free from prejudice. For this reason, before and during legal proceedings, all comment, both in reports and headlines, must avoid being one-sided or prejudicial. An accused person must not be described as guilty before final judgement has been passed. Court decisions should not be blogged on before they are announced unless there are serious reasons to justify such action.
  14. Blog posts on medical subjects should not be of an unnecessarily sensationalist nature that could raise unfounded fears or hopes among readers. Research findings that are still at an early stage should not be portrayed as conclusive or almost conclusive.
  15. The acceptance or granting of privileges of any kind which could influence the freedom of decision on the part of the blogger are irreconcilable with the prestige, independence and mission of blogspace at large. Anyone accepting bribes for the dissemination of blog posts acts in a dishonourable and unprofessional manner.