RSS
 

Anti-Brand Consumer Input

04 Apr 2006

A few weeks ago I posted about the Chevy Tahoe Campaign, where Chevy had teamed with ‘The Apprentice’ and launched a consumer-generated advertising contest about that SUV. Well, this weekend the story began to spread that the campaign is backfiring a little. This is something that could have been expected, no doubt. Some anti-SUV people and some ‘Save the Earth’ people started to ‘abuse’ the channel Chevy openend up for the creative fans and produced messages that were directly aimed against Chevy and SUV users.

Here’s what some blogs in my feed say about this:

AdRants: “Negative things will always be said about a brand. Understanding and accepting opposing views does far more for a brand’s mojo than killing off divergent opinion. Let’s hope this is what’s happening at Chevy and not that the ads are still up because it’s the weekend and big companies don’t work weekends.”

Seth’s Blog: “Chevy is learning this the hard way with their Tahoe campaign… in which the best commercials are the ones that say, ‘Don’t buy me!’”

TechDirt: “It seems like perhaps GM understood what would happen a lot more than the so-called ‘experts’ give them credit for. In this day, anyone opening up such a contest has to know that it’ll be used for ‘anti’ ads. It’s happened so often that they must have expected it. In fact, by then being open about it, GM is getting even more mileage from this campaign, and making it appear that they are more open to listening to those who disagree with them…So, it’s questionable as to whether or not GM was ’slow to react’ or if they are simply doing everything according to plan.”

To be honest, this anti-reaction isn’t surprizing at all. Most of the people who actually take the time to do this are either ignorant, jealous or don’t have enough money to buy an SUV of their own. I for one love the design of a Cherokee Jeep. I’m saving up for it and I’ll enjoy the day I go out to buy this brand new superswell car. Those leftist-nature-savers are very often driving second hand cars that produce a lot more exhaust fumes than any new car does. They recycle vehicles that should’ve been terminated years ago, but instead they drive them around and yell to SUV owners, calling them planet polluters. I’ll tell you this. 5 people I know own an SUV, 4 of them have a gas tank installed. They don’t pollute as much as (left) people say they do. They all pay taxes, it was their choice to buy a car like this. In any democratic country that should be enough to be left alone.

I think GM is setting a great example by letting these green fascists tree-huggers use their tools to express their thoughts. It gives those anti SUV people the democratic freedom they actually take away from GM and any SUV driver/producer. As for the anti-commercials… ah well, most of the content is so lame it’s not even worth linking to.

 
2 Comments

Posted by Miel Van Opstal in Advertising, Campaigns, Interactive, Marketing

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  1. Über Kevin

    April 4, 2006 at 3:25 pm

    Easy, easy, no need to get emotional.
    Your remarks about “leftists” are about as cliché as their remarks about SUV’s.
    Though there’s lots of good to be said about “User generated content” (ex: the user generated objects in Sims), it’s no sure hit when used as marketing tool.
    Deal with it, don’t shoot the messengers.

     
  2. Coolz0r

    April 4, 2006 at 7:19 pm

    Yah, I agree. But sometimes it just feels good to rant :)