RSS
 

Archive for April, 2005

The Future Of Mobile Communication

12 Apr 2005

Technology is a funky thing. I envy anyone who’s in a product or concept design team with unlimited fundings. Man, that would be great. I personally only know a few people who have experience in this field and are really admirable in what they perform. The creation of new toys and possibilities with newly discovered materials on high-class design standards is the best thing you can possibly do for yourself, and for the rest of the world. We must let technology blend in and serve us.

A company like Nokia for example, which serves an incredibly large audience, would be a very good place for a product engineer to end up. Too bad you seldomly get to hear about all the ideas that all these engineers have been writing down or have been archiving, but never made it to be seen by the public.

What about the future? How will ‘communication’ in general be performed? Which gadgets do these engineers think we should all be wearing? How will they be activated and worn? Good questions. And they deserve a fine answer.

All the latest about Nokia’s Future Files and Inventions on the special Club Nokia Concept Lounge, a site where ideas can grow.
(Navigation in the top right corner, should you get lost in Nokia’s World)

If you have great ideas for yourself, you can enter them to be selected for the first prize of this contest. ( a 7710 Nokia )

Best ideas also are putted in the ThinkTank, so that engineers can do something useful with it and maybe put it into production.

Zond

The Zond, by Thomas,
member of Nokia’s
Innovative Design Team

 

Selling Ideas Through Auction Web Sites

12 Apr 2005

I’ve always thought consulting would be the job for me when I’d finish school. Free-lancing for a few companies, advising people here and there. Yeah. I could make a living like that. But the one thing that would never cross my mind is to actually sell an idea and see how much money it would wheel in. Somebody did have this kinky twist in his thinking and went ahead as all-time firster.

Nathan Weinberg has blogged about this too on InsideGoogle.

Click here to go there and read it all.

I like the idea, and I’ve got to give credits to this guy for trying, but I think it’s a bit out of reach. The borderline with ‘impostry’ is getting pretty near, let’s say we’re in the grey zone. I’ve always been a WYSIWYG kind of person, and I’d like to know what I’m paying for.

In this case, it could be that the idea itself is of great value, but then the seller would be stupid to sell it under the real estimated value. (Somebody officially has to put a ‘potential-market-value’ on it, for starters). On the other hand, let’s say the bidding reaches several thousands of dollars… and the idea turns out to be a flop. Then I think the one who’s bought the idea could turn against the seller, for it was not worth it’s value.

It’s a free market, and you can’t forbid ‘Ideas’ of being offered for sale, that is a fact beyond any doubts. But I think there should be some sort of value-verification on the sold goods. What’s the next step? A goblet with Alp’s Air for € 400 ? Sand from every coast sold per ounce? It’s time to get real.

 

iPod Photo To Be Sold HP-Branded As hPod

12 Apr 2005

According to Nate Mook from BetaNews, Apple and HP have struck an agreement which allows HP to sell branded versions of the iPod Photo,

“despite assumptions that flat sales of the standard HP iPod would limit such an expansion. HP will offer both the 30GB and 60GB iPod Photo priced identically to Apple’s own models.”

The release of the branded iPod by HP surely answers a lot of questions Engadget’s Peter Rojas posted in his work of October 27th. I must say he really has a nose for these things when it comes to fusions and negotiative talkings and the possible consequences for the products of all parties involved.

What will it cost and how will it be named?

Engadget’s new post from april 12th states :

“HP announced today that the hPod lives: they’re going to be carrying HP-branded versions of both the 30GB and 60GB iPod photo, selling each for the same price as its regular Apple counterpart.”

iPod Photo
iPod-Photo, by Apple
 

Sony’s Brain Plug Patent

11 Apr 2005

A great leap into the future shows me Matrix-alike plugs that can teach me Kung-Fu in a few seconds. You thought it’d never become real? Think again. It’s about to happen in the near future !

“The technique could one day be used to create video games in which you can smell, taste, and touch, or to help people who are blind or deaf. The U.S. patent, granted to Sony researcher Thomas Dawson, describes a technique for aiming ultrasonic pulses at specific areas of the brain to induce “sensory experiences” such as smells, sounds and images.”

Wow. So to break open an almost closed case, people in a coma could be able to virtually sense things, if this technology would be specifically deployed in the medical sector. But it isn’t. Let’s not jump to conclusions. Yet. Question is : If this technology is going to be fine-tuned and improved, at what point will we be able to know if it is being used on us?
Because here’s the thing:

“The pulsed ultrasonic signal alters the neural timing in the cortex,” the patent states. “No invasive surgery is needed to assist a person, such as a blind person, to view live and/or recorded images or hear sounds.”

O-how. This is a very dangerous tool in the wrong hands my friends !

Click here to go there and read it all on CNN’s Technology Page.

(Tipped by : Larz D.)

 

First Felony Spam Case In The U.S.

10 Apr 2005

Mr. Larz D., a Launchcake lunatic, has brought it to my attention that accross the ocean the first spammer has been sentenced for nine years. Clever and investigative as I am, I snatched some lines from MSNCB about the story of Jeremy Jaynes.

“Jaynes, 30, who was considered among the top 10 spammers in the world at the time of his arrest, used the Internet to peddle pornography and sham products and services such as a “FedEx refund processor,” prosecutors said. Thousands of people fell for his e-mails, and prosecutors said Jaynes’ operation grossed up to $750,000 per month.

Jaynes was convicted in November for using false Internet addresses and aliases to send mass e-mail ads through an AOL server in Loudoun County, where America Online is based. Under Virginia law, sending unsolicited bulk e-mail itself is not a crime unless the sender masks his identity.”

Fact to be mentioned is that Jeremy Jaynes remains out of prison, revoking the decision. Appeal pending.

Although it made the headlines across the ocean, even in this tiny dot, I don’t think this case is ‘the end of spam’. First of all, the final decision still needs to be taken, Jaynes isn’t a con yet. Next, I think that if you look at this case closely, you’ll find that Jaynes isn’t sued for sending spam, but for doing so ‘with a masked identity’, using phony accounts.

So, the point of this case isn’t whether spam is going to be out of the law from now on or not. The point is : Did Jaynes commit fraude, according to the laws of Virginia (the state), or didn’t he.

The fact that he sended thousands of e-mails and made millions of dollars by doing it is only one that I can dream of. He’s found a hole in the market, dove into it and got his share of the profits. That’s how the market is working. What he should have done, however, was to move his operation to a state where the sending of unsolicited bulk e-mail was legal, and the masking of your identity too. At least in cyberspace. And that brings us to another burning question.

Because aren’t we all masking our identity, with all our nicknames @something.com? Are we all trespassers? Will we become outlaws and cons-to-be? Part of the freedom of internet is to be able to change your identity for free. I’ve done it a few times myself. I’d feel less free if that right will be taken away from me.

 

Choices

10 Apr 2005

Following my last post about PIE and cookies, here’s something to the point I’ve received a while ago. If you click the image, there’s a larger one that opens, just for keepers. ;)

Choices

 
No Comments

Posted in Geek, Humor

 

Have Some P.I.E. – Dualities In My Life

10 Apr 2005

I’ve been browsing BlogNewsChannel’s InsideMicrosoft and stumbled upon a very noticeable fact. I didn’t quite get to read it earlier because the ‘a lot to do’ factor in my life took dangerously high proportions. But, nevertheless, it remains a significant item to ‘re-blog’ about.

See I’ve come to the conclusion that the studies that I do include a sort of paradox. In the line of marketing and the research into the lives of potential consumers, it is necessary to be able to gather as much data as possible in order to aim your product advertisement to the right target group. Since the rise of new and digital media, it became very obvious to the marketeers that digital research would become a golden rule. The use of cookies was one of the many means to collect the needed data.

I myself have always been against any outside interference on my computer. Or on any device. I’m very protective when it comes to personal info. I think. At least, I’m trying to be very conscious. For that reason, I delete my cookies, my recently opened this & thats, IE history, everything I can clean will be cleaned. Luckily FireFox does it all by itself. I hate cookies, always have, always will. But the hate is more out of ignorance than out of reason. I’ve never known what the info would be used for. What was written in those files… I never wanted to know.

But the ways of marketing are profound and filled with knowledge. Thus it came to the point where I have to learn to use technology I used to hate so much. Even better: I have to try and find means to reach people who are like me and clean up the trail right after their shadow, every-where they go on the digital paths. So in fact I’ll be designing and using tools that will do things I dislike, as a consumer. But on the other hand, it will return the precious data I so sorely need.

So what does it have to do with InsideMicrosoft? Well, in his post on
How to avoid all cookies‘, Nathan Weinberg refers to MacroMedia’s Flash being thrown into battle. The reason why is explained in the following quote :

‘58% of web users have taken to deleting cookies off their machines, so marketers, ever eager to do everything against the customers wishes, are finding a new way to add persistent tracking to your computer: Flash.’

A very interesting point, because almost everybody has a recent version of the flash player installed. This opens a gateway of opportunities to the daring and exploring marketeers.

United Virtualities was the first company to hear the calls for help and Antone Gonsalves published an article about it on Internet Week.

“The New York company on Thursday unveiled what it calls PIE, or persistent identification element, a technology that’s uploaded to a browser and restores deleted cookies. In addition, PIE, which can’t be easily removed, can also act as a cookie backup, since it contains the same information.”

Click here to go there and read it all.

Well. So now there is PIE. Because people like me delete cookies on a regular basis, there is no more data to be collected. The Flash-cookie, as we will call the PIE thing from now, will be stored in the Temp folder.
The ‘why’ about this is explained to us by Mookie Tanembaum on Internet Week :

“The user is not proficient enough in technology to know if the cookie is good or bad, or how it works,” Tanembaum analyses.

So how to delete those Flash-cookies? Is there a way to feel safe again? Yes there is, and Mister Weinberg’s Slashdotted the MacroMedia url for us : Click here to read about your Flash Player Settings.

What will technology bring us next? Marketing experts are always on the lookout for new ways to penetrate into people’s lives.
It’s a good thing I choose to study marketing. At least now I’ll know how I will harass myself and others in particular in the future.

 

Perpendicular Recording With Hitachi

08 Apr 2005

New breakthroughs in Technology are also one of my favorite topics. I’m very attracted to everything that’s digital, electronic and/or new.

This time I would like to refer to Hitachi, who announced the following on their corporate site:

“In March 2005, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies demonstrated an areal density of 230 gigabits per square inch on perpendicular recording technology, the highest areal density achieved to date based on vertical recording.”

“At the current rate of growth, Hitachi expects to see products shipping at 230 gigabits per square inch in 2007, translating into storage capacities of up to 20 gigabytes* on Hitachi’s one-inch Microdrive and up to one terabyte on the Hitachi 3.5-inch Deskstar hard drive.”

Pretty impressive stuff. Another reason why it belongs in this blog is because of the ‘learning’ animation they’ve included so that people can easily understand the meaning and consequences of the invention.
Nowadays it’s become very difficult to introduce new gadgets that only float on technical details. Especially with an evolution in storage possibilities, it’s hard to promote your product based on this fact alone.

So in order for this product to be understood, and of course with the intention of selling it when understood correctly, Hitachi needed to have an instructional and attractive user guide. This has become a job well done, as you can see for yourself.
Click here to go there and get recorded perpendicularly.

What is the new deal with this perpendicular thing? To explain this would take more time than watching the tutorial, but in a nutshell it comes down to this : the bits get stored standing up instead of on their back. Doing so, this increases the space where bits are usually put. More bits, more space. Sounds easy. Bet you it isn’t. As far for the perpendicular element of this product : it is the cycle itself, illustrated with red arrows.

Hitachi